Reference

The VC-to-English
Dictionary

Every phrase a venture investor has ever used to avoid saying what they actually mean — translated into plain language. Updated continuously.

C
"Come back when you have more traction."
We have no conviction in the thesis or the team. More traction won't fix that — but it gives us a metric that, if hit, lets us claim we always believed in you. The bar will move when you get there.
"We're close to getting conviction."
We are 0% close. This is how we buy time without officially passing. Expect this phrase to repeat once more before a ghost.
"Can you send over the data room?"
At pre-seed and seed, this often means we haven't decided if we're interested yet. A VC with conviction asks pointed questions. A VC on the fence asks for a folder.
"Can you clarify the business model?"
We didn't read the deck. Or we read it and the model still isn't clear, which is a bigger problem.
F
"It's not the right fit for our portfolio."
A clean rejection dressed as a structural constraint. VCs bend their portfolio thesis regularly for companies they love. You are not one of them.
"It's a valuation issue."
We do not believe in your company enough to argue about price. Lower it and we still won't invest. The valuation is not the problem.
"We love the space."
We are not investing but want to keep tabs on you in case someone else does. Loving the space costs nothing. Writing a check costs something.
"We'd love to co-invest alongside a lead."
We want the upside without the work of due diligence. Find someone else to take the risk first, then we'll show up and take credit for believing early.
G
"Great to catch up."
This is how a VC ends a follow-up call they agreed to out of politeness. No next steps will be proposed. The ball has been left in your court permanently.
"We need to do some internal alignment."
One partner is interested. The others are not. Internal alignment almost never resolves in the founder's favour when it's been flagged this early.
I
"Interesting." (said slowly, while nodding)"
We have no idea what to say. This is a filler response deployed when a pitch has surprised them — not necessarily in a good way.
"We're intrigued but need to see more."
Intrigued is the weakest possible form of interest. It commits to nothing and obligates you to do more work before the next conversation, which may never happen.
L
"Let's stay in touch."
We are done evaluating you. This is how we close the conversation without closing the door. You will reach out in 6 months. We will say "great to hear from you." We will still not invest.
"Love the founder energy."
We don't believe in the business but we like you as a person. This is a compliment, not a signal. It will not convert into a term sheet.
M
"The market size is a concern."
We think this is a small business, not a venture-scale company. This objection is sometimes legitimate and sometimes a proxy for a different concern they don't want to name.
"We'd love to meet the team."
Positive signal — but only if it comes with a scheduled meeting, not a vague offer. "We'd love to" without a calendar invite is aspiration, not process.
N
"Not writing checks right now."
We are writing checks. Just not for you. This is the cleanest soft pass because it assigns the rejection to circumstance rather than judgment.
"Now's not the right time for us."
There is no right time. This is a rejection with a temporal escape hatch that implies you should try again later. You should not try again later.
O
"We're open to a smaller check."
We want exposure to the upside without meaningful skin in the game. A small check from a fund that should be leading is often worth less than the dilution it costs.
P
"We need a few more weeks to discuss internally."
The partner who met you hasn't brought it to the partnership yet, or brought it and got a lukewarm response. A few weeks usually becomes a few months.
"We're tracking the space closely."
We have added you to a list. The list is long. Being on it does not mean investment is forthcoming — it means we want to watch what happens to your company before deciding.
R
"We'd love to reconnect next quarter."
We are kicking the can. Next quarter will become next quarter again. Unless they give you a specific milestone to hit, this is a soft no with a calendar attached.
"Really compelling story."
The narrative worked. The business may not have. Story compliments are common from investors who enjoyed the pitch but didn't find the numbers convincing.
S
"We're going to sit this one out."
One of the cleaner rejections in the VC vocabulary. Casual phrasing that implies it was a close call. It probably wasn't.
"The structure doesn't work for us."
Terms, valuation, or instrument type is the stated issue. Sometimes true. Often a polite way of saying the conviction isn't there to negotiate around it.
"Send us an update in a few months."
We are not investing now. Whether we invest later depends entirely on whether someone else does first. The update is a formality — the real signal will be your momentum, not your email.
T
"The timing isn't right for us."
We are at the end of a fund cycle and don't want to admit it. Or: we just don't want to invest. Timing is almost never the real reason.
"Tell me more about the go-to-market."
The go-to-market slide was thin or missing. This is a genuine question, but it's also a signal that the deck left a gap that could have been pre-empted.
"We think the cap is a bit rich."
Valuation negotiation in disguise. This is a real objection worth engaging with — unlike most money-related soft passes, this one usually means they want in at a lower price.
"We'd like to do a few reference calls."
Strong positive signal. Reference calls happen when a fund is serious. Prepare your references — they will be asked specific questions about your judgment, not just your likability.
W
"We're aligned on vision."
Vision alignment is not investment conviction. This phrase signals they enjoyed the meeting and don't want to say no directly. Expect a ghost within 30 days.
"We'd love to see the next round."
We want someone else to take the price risk. If a credible investor leads, we may follow. We are not interested in being early. We are interested in being safe.
"Walk me through the unit economics."
Either you didn't include unit economics in the deck (you should have), or you did and the numbers raised a question. Either way, have them memorised cold.
"We'll pass for now but stay in touch."
This is the clearest rejection in the dictionary. "For now" is decorative. Move on.
"We need to see you find your lead first."
We will follow if someone else validates the round. We will not lead. We will also not help you find the lead. The ball remains in your court indefinitely.
"We're in the middle of a fund close."
Sometimes true, rarely the full story. A fund closing is not a reason to stop evaluating investments — it may mean bandwidth is low, but conviction moves fast when it's real.
"Can you share your financial model?"
At pre-seed, a model request can signal genuine interest or a stall. At seed and beyond, it's standard. Make sure your model is defensible line by line — they will ask about specific assumptions.
"Who else is in the round?"
They want to know if anyone they respect has already committed. Social proof matters enormously at early stages. If the answer is nobody yet, don't apologise — pivot to momentum.
"We just don't have the bandwidth right now."
Bandwidth is never the real reason. VCs make time for companies they want to invest in. This is a soft no that spares both parties an awkward conversation.
"Let's reconnect after the holidays."
The holidays are not the obstacle. This is a delay tactic that uses a socially acceptable pause to avoid a direct decision. If they were serious, they'd schedule the call before going away.
"We're monitoring a few things in the space."
You are one of several companies in a watch list. Being monitored is the opposite of being invested in. The monitoring may last years and produce nothing.
"How defensible is this?"
They don't see a moat. This is a real concern worth answering directly and specifically. Vague answers about network effects and proprietary data will not satisfy a VC who is asking this question with intent.
"This is more of a lifestyle business."
A politely devastating assessment. It means we don't see this becoming a venture-scale outcome. It is sometimes correct and sometimes a failure of imagination on the investor's part.
"We'd want pro-rata rights in future rounds."
A real ask with real implications. Pro-rata rights let investors maintain their percentage in future rounds. Model what this looks like at Series A before agreeing — it can crowd out new investors.
"We want to run this by our LP base."
Unusual at early stages. At later stages, some funds genuinely do this. More commonly it signals internal hesitation being outsourced to a less confrontational process.
"We just need to get through Q4."
Q4 will become Q1. Q1 will become after the offsite. The calendar is always an excuse when conviction is missing. Real interest doesn't wait for a quarter to end.
Heard something new?

Add to the dictionary

Got a phrase from a VC that belongs in here? Submit it and we'll translate it.